Your Say

Your Say

LETTER: Council berated and bullied

Unsurprisingly, there were two letters in your edition of January 5 from the high priests of the northern nimbies, Messrs Kirk and Tucker, rubbishing the proposed reinstatement of a proper consultation process to improve our traffic, and to restore faith and trust in that process.

Your Say

LETTER: ‘Benefits’ of A27 option 2

Your Lavant correspondent, Dr Tucker, (Letters, Chichester Observer, 5 January) should be commended for carefully tracking the various pronouncements by Louise Goldsmith and her colleagues on West Sussex County Council with regard to the A27 Improvement Scheme over the past year.

Your Say 1

LETTER: Do people want eight-year delay

I fear that the various proposals for the Chichester by-pass are more testing than the question that required the wisdom of Solomon.

Your Say 3

LETTER: Who supporting who on options?

In view of one of the Observer’s news items on the A27 options, it was recently reported that one councillor has had benefits from Goodwood Estate Company etc. I wonder how many more have?

Your Say

LETTER: North residents left vulnerable

I am no expert when it comes to talking about cars and roads, but It was very obvious from the beginning that the architect of the bypass options had very little local knowledge.

Your Say 1

LETTER: Vision should be whole district

As reported in the Observer of the 22nd December, Chichester District Council leader, Tony Dignum, encouraged his council to vote in favour of the southern option2 A27 bypass route, despite admitting he had a personal reason for doing so.

Your Say

LETTER: South resident led down again

Louise Goldsmith is right to request transparency about the anti-democratic behaviour that removed the Northern route from the A27 consultation.

Your Say

LETTER: All had chance to comment

If we accept the Best 4 Chichester figures of 29,000 voters affected by the possible modified routes of an improved bypass, and add the number of voters living in the city itself, say 21,000, that’s a total of 50,000 who could be expected to take an interest in the project.

Your Say

LETTER: Wool pulled over his eyes

It seems the Secretary of State for Transport, Chris Grayling, during his recent visit to Chichester, met too many Southdown Sheep and had the wool pulled over his eyes.

Your Say 1

LETTER: Risk project being shelved

I am emailing you as an outraged Chichester voting resident and tax payer.

Your Say 3

LETTER: CDC’s visit to Goodwood

Your correspondent Alan Green, chairman of Southern Gateway Residents Association, asks (Letters, 5th January) a number of questions about the visit by CDC cllrs to Goodwood Estate; in particular he asks who arranged the visit; which councillors attended; what hospitality was extended; and what did Lord March expect and/or get promised in return.

Your Say 1

LETTER: Next best option for the A27

I read your report about the rethink on the A27 this week and I have the following thoughts.

Your Say

LETTER: Consultation re-run a mistake

I have read your press release issued on Friday 30th December informing your readers that the Chichester District Council Cabinet will consider a motion at their next meeting on January 10, 2017, asking members to agree to back a new consultation which would contain Options 4 and 5, both new northern bypasses, which were dropped ahead of Highways England’s ten-week consultations between July and September. (see http://www.chichester.co.uk/news/chichester-district-councillors-set- to-back- a27-consultation- re-run- 1-7753003)

Your Say 2

LETTER: Need to take the opportunity

Chichester Deserves Better than nothing, but nothing is what we will get if there is not strong support for improvements to the A27 junctions.

Your Say 2

LETTER: Allow HE to accept results

I understand that, quoting Chichester Deserves Better, “Louise Goldsmith, leader of WSCC, has written to the CEO of Highways England suggesting that the A27 consultation should be re-run and that this should include the northern bypass.”

Your Say 4

LETTER: North route is logical and fair

While not directly affected I feel very strongly that the only sensible, logical and fair route for the new road is the Northern route.

The fact that it runs through large rural swathes of land owned by the Goodwood estate is immaterial.

Your Say 1

LETTER: May lead to better decision

I fully support Louise Goldsmith’s proposal to rerun the A27 consultation, this time to include northern options.

Your Say

LETTER: Charities forced into conflict

So this is what it has come to: two wonderful groups of hospital volunteers – the Friends of Chichester Hospital and the WRVS – who each have done so much over the years to support the patients, staff and visitors at our hospital now forced into a situation of conflict by the actions of the Trustees who insist they ‘value our efforts’.

Your Say

LETTER: Leader’s email said much more

Earnley Parish Council were entirely justified in complaining about the email Cllr Dignum, the Leader of Chichester District Council, sent to an unidentified person expressing his fulsome support for the Anti-Northern Bypass campaign (Observer, December 22).

Your Say 1

LETTER: County was involved in A27 proposals

The Chichester Observer (December 22) congratulates Louise Goldsmith, leader of WSCC, on her ‘dramatic’ intervention – apparently in a private meeting with Transport Secretary Chris Grayling and local political leaders – in the Highways England A27 consultation process: an intervention which could lead to a rerun of the process.

Your Say 1
Load more